Friday, 13 April 2012
Endings in The Bloody Chamber collection
The ending of The Bloody Chamber shows a role reversal in characters. It is down to female intuition that the protagonist is saved. The mother hears down the phone that her daughter feels unsettled, therefore acts upon it by riding right over there with a gun. The Marquis gets shot by the mother, another example of role reversal and female power, and on a metaphorical level, the gun could represent modern times; the Marquis lives in a very old castle, his weapons are medieval and his weapon of choice for killing his latest wife is a sword, therefore the gun could represent modern times conquering the old days.
We know that the story is set in retrospect; "I remember how..." so the reader understands that the ending to the story is what transforms her into a much wiser person. The marriage between her and the blind piano tuner represents unity, which before there was none regarding the marriage of the daughter and the Marquis. And their donations to charities and opening of a music school shows their good will, kindness and development - they have taken something terrible; their marriage, the deaths etc, and made it into something beautiful.
The Courtship of Mr Lyon
Role reversal is another great theme in this story, as it is in The Bloody Chamber. The ending of the story shows the woman to be the saviour. She breaks her promise to Mr Lyon and vanity takes over her life. But when she finally goes back to Mr Lyon, it is almost too late, but she does indeed save his life. Mr Lyon goes through a metamorphosis, although it is pretty ambiguous. But nevertheless he is then considered to be 'human' and they live ''happily ever after''; which fits into the fairy-tale theme which runs through the story.
The Tiger's Bride
This story is very similar to 'The Courtship of Mr Lyon' in a way that at the ending of the story, there is another transformation; but this time it is of the woman - she transforms into a beast. The fact that they are now both beasts, and both equal, shows a unity between them. It could also show that they have become humans in their most natural state, the woman has embraced her beastial side. The ending of the story also shows that the woman has learned a lesson. Before in the story she is told that ''a lamb must learn to run with the lion'', meaning that she shouldn't mock men and have the attitude towards them like she does at the start; (that they are either weak like her father or have a lust for power like the beast). She has dropped her arrogant facade (represented metaphorically by the crumbling of the building) and has learned to ''run with the lion''. She can now be empowered. The diamond earrings return back to their natural state which symbolises forgiveness, and also ties in with the idea that everything has returned to its natural state- even the house has crumbled down so they can live in the outdoors; in nature. In a way, the ending of this story is a bit like the Romantic ideals; that everything to do with nature and naturalness is sacred.
Sunday, 25 March 2012
'The Green Man'

The Green Man is usually a sculpture of a masculine face which is covered with leaves or vegetation. He is known as the symbol of rebirth or the cycle of life. he usually comes in one of three forms;
1. The Foliated Head - completely covered in greenery
2. The Disgorging Head - spews vegetation from mouth
3. The Bloodsucker Head - vegetation comes out of every orifice.
Although argued as a symbol from Paganism, some suggest it was brought to Europe. Some of the earliest examples have been found in Jerusalem c. 2nd century, and also examples in Borneo, Nepal and India c. 8th century.
In Paganism, The Green Man is a sign of the fertility of the man of the woods. The earliest examples of him have him sprutting vegetation from every orifice, like The Bloodsucker Head, but with a face completely covered in foliage. A sculpture has been found to be dated from c.400AD. The Pagan's apparently found The Green Man eerie and mysterious. Wicca suggest he is linked with magical powers. In Neo-Paganism, he is considered a horned God or a syncretic deity, linking back to fertility then. If his face begins to sprout leaves or foliage, it is a symbol of 'becoming one with nature'.
Other cultural references include a Green Man called 'Khidir' in Islam, in which he symbolises the dismembering and re-birth of Khidir. There are many prophecy's concerning him and the end of time. It is also noted that he is known for his tireless enthusiasm.
In Egypt, he is known as 'Osiris', he is a corn deity and also represents vegetation, re-birth and resurrection.
However in modern culture, he is mostly decorative. We've got one on our shed. His sculpture went through many rises of popularity, especially in the Gothic revival. It is also suggested that the character of Robin Hood is linked some how to the Green Man, as they are both men of woods, I assume.
The Character of Puss
The story of Puss In Boots presents us with the first male narrator in Angela Carter's collection. He is very different to the characters of the female narrators, and is even quite unlike any of the male characters in the other stories. Portrayed as the 'Brighella', Puss is the servant of a soldier, helping him to seduce women and acquire food. From the start, the reader is aware that the cat is sexually promiscuous; "...can slip into my lady's chamber". Even his linguistic prowess suggests his obsession for sex; "Merrrrrrci!".Monday, 12 March 2012
Commedia Dell'arte
The Commedia Dell'arte is a type of theatre which has been characterised by the masks the characters wear. It began in Italy in the late 16th century and spawned improvised performances based on stories, scenarios and sketches. The closest translation of Commedia dell'arte is 'comedy of the craft of improvisation'. This type of theatre was known for its elaborate settings, many props and colourful costumes. They often performed in the streets with temporary settings so that everyone could watch the performances free of charge, but after growing wildly popular, they often performed in front of nobility.
The characters were based on 'stock characters', based on stereotypes, such as foolish men or devious servants.
4 Characters
Arlecchino (The Harlequin)
While the Arlecchino was primarily perceived as being stupid and often gluttonous, he was also there for his nimble, physical ability and performed the acrobatics the audiences expected to see. Typically, he is cast as the servant to the master. Interestingly, he often has a love interest, and is only deterred from her by the fear of his master or by food. By the late 18th century, he was viewed more as a hopeless romantic.
Brighella
A comic of the Commedia, due to his outfit/costume, he was generally viewed for his preternatural lust and greed. Often portrayed as a servant, or a member of the middle class, such as a tavern owner. He is a masterful liar, and can make up things on the spot. A good schemer, if he is playing the part of a servant, he is either very loyal to his master or is looking for any opportunity to ruin him. He spends money like it's going out of fashion on things like food and drink, so he is a gluttonous character. Although he's a bit of a villain, he is an accomplished musician and dancer and is often very witty on stage.
Scaramuccia (Scaramouche)
(I picked this one because it's in Bohemian Rhapsody yeah). Quite an interesting character, he always wears black and a black mask. He is a clown and entertains the audiences. He is usually portrayed as a boastful clown or a buffoon. He is often beaten by the Harlequin for being boastful or for his cowardice.
Innamorati
'The Lovers' are over dramatic in every way with every emotion they express. They complain when they're together, but when they finally meet, (get your sick buckets ready), they can't express themselves in awe at their partner. They usually need help from a lesser person (a servant) to help express their feelings about seeing their lover again. They throw tantrums like a child, they stomp feet, cry and pout. Both are selfish and self centered. As well as being in love with themselves and apparently each other, they are in love with the idea of LOVE itself and what love is.They are in the play to be in love, nothing more. They are often young people, the female wearing expensive silk and jewellery whilst the male wears solider like attire. They both wear extravagant wigs and change various times between costumes during the length of the play.
Monday, 5 March 2012
Final Thoughts On 'The Bloody Chamber'
Interesting Stuff in pages 18-36
From what I can remember when I annotated these few pages, I think what interested me the most was the introduction of the second male character, the piano tuner. His blindness must symbolise something, in my opinion it probably has something to do with the male gaze. He can't look at her and objectify her/ lust after her, suggesting that he is...more than a regular generic man, possibly. Also, his blindness could suggest that his other sense are more heightened, so he might be more of a good listener; which brings me onto my next point. The omission of the male gaze makes the man a more of a sensitive female character. His appearance is 'gentle' and 'young' unlike the Marquis, who is referred to as Leoine. All of these factors makes the reader feel more able to trust the piano tuner more than the Marquis.
What else interested me was the corridor leading towards the bloody chamber. The venetian tapestries suggests heads on the wall or violence- which is foreshadowing the contents of the chamber. The thick carpet and the covered walls which muffle the sounds also could symbolise a secret, that is whispered and kept quite, because the chamber is the marquis' secret.
Monday, 20 February 2012
Mulvey and her Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema
Right. So Laura Mulvey is a distinguished professor of Film and Media Studies at Wellesley College, and wrote a rather noteworthy essay in 1973 called 'Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema'. (So far so good.)
Her first theme in this essay was "The Gaze and the Female Specter". She wrote that it is the woman's look which spurs on the actions of the hero of the film. She argues that the passive role of women in cinema provides visual pleasure through voyeurism, and identification with the male actor. She suggests that women are to be looked at in a film, displayed and her appearance is 'coded' for an erotic impact. (This is kind of true, think about the 70's, anybody watched The Spy Who Loved Me?)
She wrote that women are objectified in films, and that there are three 'looks' to a women in the film. The first look is that from the male heroin's perspective. The second is the spectators view, and the third perspective (GET THIS) allows the male audience to take the female character as his own personal sex object because he can relate himself, through looking, to the male character in the film. (WHAT IS THAT ABOUT?)
There is a lot more about her essay, which I had a go at reading, but I found it a little far fetched and to be quite honest, boring and rambling. But I have learnt something from this. I am never watching a film with a lad again if he thinks the heroine is his personal sex slave.
